THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte FREDERICK A. GILES
and CHARLES W. GLANCY
______________
Appeal No. 95-1148
Application 07/873,3451
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, PAK and WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on Appeal and Opinion
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision of the examiner finally rejecting
claims 1 through 57.2
We have carefully considered the record before us, and based thereon, find that we
cannot sustain any of the grounds of rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 102 or § 103 over each of Smith
1 Application for patent filed April 21, 1992. According to appellants, this application is a continuation
of application 07/540,174, filed June 19, 1990 now abandoned.
2 Specification, pages 30-37, and amendment of April 21, 1992 (Paper No. 13).
- 1 -
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007