Ex parte MORRIS et al. - Page 1




                                                                                                                      Paper No. 16                                                     
                                THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                                                           
                     The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                                                                                                        
                     (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                                                                                                          
                     (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                                                                        

                                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                                               
                                                                           _______________                                                                                             
                                                      BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                                               
                                                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                                                             
                                                                           _______________                                                                                             
                                                               Ex parte RICHARD J. MORRIS                                                                                              
                                                                            ______________                                                                                             
                                                                        Appeal No. 96-3771                                                                                             
                                                                Application 08/127,0051                                                                                                
                                                                           _______________                                                                                             
                                                                           ON BRIEF                                                                                                    
                                                                           _______________                                                                                             
                     Before COHEN, MEISTER and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent                                                                                                         
                     Judges.                                                                                                                                                           
                     MEISTER, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                                                                      
                                                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                                             
                                Richard J. Morris (the appellant) appeals from the final                                                                                               
                     rejection of claims 2-5 and 11.  Claims 6-10, the only other                                                                                                      
                     claims remaining in the application, have been indicated as                                                                                                       
                     being allowable subject to the requirement that they be                                                                                                           



                                1Application for patent filed September 24, 1993.                                                                                                      
                                                                                          1                                                                                            





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007