Paper No. 17
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte DAVID BAKER
______________
Appeal No. 97-1080
Application 08/201,7331
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before CALVERT, MEISTER, and PAK, Administrative Patent Judges.
MEISTER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
David Baker (the appellant) appeals from the final rejection
of 1, 2, 6, 8-11 and 16. Claims 3-5 and 12-15, the only other
claims remaining in the application, stand allowed. We reverse.
The appellant’s invention pertains to (1) a spacecraft, (2)
a liquid pumping arrangement and (3) to an apparatus.
Independent claims 1, 8 and 16 are further illustrative of the
1Application for patent filed February 25, 1994.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007