The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and
is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DOMENICO FANARA, MONIQUE BERWAER,
ANNE BOUQUELLE, and MICHEL DELEERS
____________
Appeal No. 2003-0569
Application No. 09/381,044
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before TIMM, ADAMS, and GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judges.
TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants appeal the final rejection of claims 11-20, all the claims pending in the
Application.1 We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 134.
1The two After-Final Amendments (Paper Nos. 12 and 16) were not entered (Advisory Action, Paper No.
13; Office Communication, Paper No. 21) and, thus, the claims proposed therein will not be considered in our
review.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007