Ex Parte Knoll et al - Page 1



           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was                          
           not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the                         
           Board.                                                                                  
                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                 
                                                                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                    
                                       AND INTERFERENCES                                           
                                                                                                  
                Ex parte PETER KNOLL, JOHANNES ESCHIER and REINHOLD FLESS                          
                                                                                                  
                                     Appeal No. 2006-0323                                          
                                    Application 10/088,727                                         
                                                                                                  
                                            ON BRIEF                                               
                                                                                                  
           Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH, and BARRY, Administrative Patent                          
           Judges.                                                                                 
           JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                               

                                       DECISION ON APPEAL                                          
                 This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from                       
           the examiner’s rejection of claims 16-42, which constitute all                          
           the claims pending in this application.                                                 
           The disclosed invention pertains to a display apparatus for                             
           a vehicle.  The display apparatus comprises a projection unit                           
           arranged on a vehicle roof or on an inside mirror of the vehicle                        







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007