Ex Parte LUNDAHL - Page 1



                       The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                                  
                        written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                 

                           UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                       
                                                  ________________                                                         
                                 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                        
                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                            
                                                  ________________                                                         
                                           Ex parte DAVE B. LUNDAHL                                                        
                                                  ________________                                                         
                                                  Appeal 2006-1417                                                         
                                                Application 09/326,405                                                     
                                               Technology Center 3600                                                      
                                                  ________________                                                         
                                             Decided:  October 27, 2006                                                    
                                                  ________________                                                         

                  Before KIMLN, GARRIS, and WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges.                                          
                  KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                     


                                              DECISION ON APPEAL                                                           
                         This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 11-33.  Claim 11 is                          
                  illustrative:                                                                                            
                  11. An operable window system with a removable screen comprising:                                        
                                a fixed frame;                                                                             
                                a moving sash connected to said fixed frame and operable to                                
                  substantially swing about an axis with respect to said fixed frame from an                               
                  open position to a closed position; and                                                                  
                                                                                                                          




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007