The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte WOLFGANG KLAUCK,
ERNST-ULRICH RUST, LUDGER WILLEKE,
PETER DAUTE, JOHANN KLEIN,
and ALFRED STRUVE
____________
Appeal No. 2006-1931
Application No. 10/305,201
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before GARRIS, WALTZ, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Applicants appeal the decision of the Primary Examiner finally rejecting claims 16 to 34
and 43. Claims 39-42 have been withdrawn from consideration.1 We have jurisdiction under
35 U.S.C. ' 134.
1 In rendering this decision, we have considered the Appellants' arguments presented in the Briefs filed February 14,
2005 and April 28, 2005 and the Examiner's position presented in the Answer mailed May 11, 2005.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007