Ex Parte Reeve - Page 1



                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                           
                           for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  


                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                    
                                                    __________                                                         
                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                     
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                         
                                                    __________                                                         
                                            Ex parte JOHN A. REEVE                                                     
                                                    __________                                                         
                                                 Appeal 2006-2802                                                      
                                              Application 10/640,367                                                   
                                             Technology Center 1700                                                    
                                                    ___________                                                        
                                            Decided:  August 25, 2006                                                  
                                                    ___________                                                        
              Before KIMLIN, TIMM, and FRANKLIN, Administrative Patent Judges.                                         
              KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                     

                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                        
                     This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-6 and 9-54.  Claim 1 is                    
              illustrative:                                                                                            
                           1.   A method of treating a solid substrate, the method comprising:                         
                                  (I)    providing a solid substrate;                                                  
                                  (II)   spraying the solid substrate with an aqueous solution of                      
                     at least one material capable of reacting at or near the solid substrate surface                  
                     selected from a group consisting of (i) reactive silanes, (ii) reactive                           
                     siloxanes, (iii) hydrolysis products of (i), (iv) hydrolysis products of (ii), and                





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007