The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte BRIAN A. VAARTSTRA
________________
Appeal 2007-0918
Application 10/931,868
Technology Center 1700
________________
Decided: June 19, 2007
________________
Before CHUNG K. PAK, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and
JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection of
claims 1-30. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6 (2006).
According to Appellant, the invention is directed to a chemical vapor
deposition system including a deposition chamber, and a vessel containing a
precursor composition (Br. 2). Claim 1 is illustrative of the invention and is
reproduced below:
1. A chemical vapor deposition system comprising:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013