The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent
of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
___________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
___________
Ex parte ANNE J. OSINGA
___________
Appeal No. 2007-0994
Application No. 10/171,358
Technology Center 3600
___________
Decided: July 27, 2007
___________
Before WILLIAM F. PATE, III, JENNIFER D. BAHR, and HUBERT C. LORIN,
Administrative Patent Judges.
PATE, III, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 4, 5, 36-38, 40, 47, and
48. Claims 34, 35, and 66 are canceled. Claims 2, 3, 6-33, 39, 49, and 51-65 stand
withdrawn from consideration, and claims 41-46, 50, 67, and 68 stand allowed.
We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. §§ 134 and 6.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013