The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is
not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HARRY M. CLARK,
WILLIAM D. SCHOENHERR,
CRAIG R. COWLEY
And KIM G. FRIESEN
____________
Appeal 2007-1180
Application 10/405,742
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: September 6, 2007
____________
Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, CHARLES F. WARREN, and
LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final
rejection of claims 1-7. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6.
We AFFIRM.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013