The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte STEPHEN W. COMISKEY
AND BARRETT O. COMISKEY
____________
Appeal 2007-1182
Application 10/020,136
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: May 21, 2007
____________
Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, CHUNG K. PAK, and PETER F. KRATZ,
Administrative Patent Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 21-40. Claim 21 is
illustrative:
21. A method of reducing reflected light glare into a human's eyes
from the human's cheeks, the method comprising the steps of:
applying underneath the human's eyes, on the human's cheeks,
generally covering a location at which incident direct or indirect light is
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013