The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ROBERT IIMONEN
____________
Appeal 2007-1391
Application 10/875.047
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: July 6, 2007
____________
Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, BRADLEY R. GARRIS, and
CHUNG K. PAK, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
Primary Examiner’s refusal to allow claims 1 and 2. Claims 3 through 5, the
other claims pending in the above-identified application, were indicated to
be “allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the
limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims.” (Answer 4). We
have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6.
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013