The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ZHU ZHAO CHONG
Appeal 2007-1685
Application 10/106,402
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: June 29, 2007
____________
Before PETER F. KRATZ, JEFFREY T. SMITH and
LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.
GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the Examiner’s rejection of claims 1-20 and
25-33.1 Although the action appealed from was a non-final rejection, we
have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134 since these claims have
been twice presented and rejected. See Ex parte Lemoine, 46 USPQ2d 1420,
1423 (Bd. Pat. App. & Int. 1994).
We affirm.
1 An oral hearing was conducted on June 6, 2007.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013