The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte HANS DAVID HOEG, ERIC LAWRENCE HALE,
and NATHAN JON SCHARA
__________
Appeal 2007-2314
Application 10/657,110
Technology Center 3700
__________
Decided: September 6, 2007
__________
Before DONALD E. ADAMS, ERIC GRIMES, and LORA M. GREEN,
Administrative Patent Judges.
GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 involving claims to a method
involving a variable-direction-of-view endoscope. The Examiner has
rejected the claims as obvious. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
We affirm.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013