Court Opinions

State Laws

US Code

US Constitution

Ex parte GUEVEL et al. - Page 1

Legal Research Home > Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 1997 > Ex parte GUEVEL et al. - Page 1

                                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                        
                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                                                          
                          today (1) was not written for publication in a law                                                                            
                          journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the                                                                               
                          Board.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                Paper No. 23                            
                                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                        
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                         
                                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                                           
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                             Ex parte JEAN GUEVEL, MARC FRANCOIS and GUY CONTEMPS                                                                       
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                                           Appeal No. 95-0429                                                                           
                                                    Application No. 07/730,1991                                                                         
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                                      HEARD: December 10, 1997                                                                          
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                 Before JOHN D. SMITH, PAK, and WARREN, Administrative Patent                                                                           
                 Judges.                                                                                                                                
                 PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                      
                                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                           
                          This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of                                                                      
                 claims 1 through 6 and 8.  Claim 7 stands withdrawn from                                                                               
                 further consideration by the examiner as being drawn to a                                                                              
                 nonelected invention.                                                                                                                  
                          Claim 1 is illustrative of the subject matter on appeal                                                                       
                 and is reproduced below:                                                                                                               


                          1Application for patent filed July 15, 1991.                                                                                  





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007