Ex parte TAHARA - Page 1




                                                                                                              Paper No. 22                                                 

                              THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                                                 
                    The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                                                                                             
                    (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                                                                                               
                    (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                                                             

                                            UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                                      
                                                                      _______________                                                                                      
                                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                                      
                                                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                                                                      
                                                                      _______________                                                                                      
                                                              Ex parte KATSUMI TAHARA                                                                                      
                                                                       ______________                                                                                      
                                                                   Appeal No. 96-0553                                                                                      
                                                            Application 08/020,9931                                                                                        
                                                                      _______________                                                                                      
                                                            HEARD: JULY 16, 1997                                                                                           
                                                                      _______________                                                                                      
                    Before HARKCOM, Vice Chief Administrative Patent Judge, and                                                                                            
                    THOMAS and KRASS, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                                                        
                    THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                                                          
                                                                   DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                                      
                              Appellant has appealed to the Board from the examiner’s                                                                                      
                    final rejection of claims 7 to 28, which constitute all the                                                                                            
                    claims remaining in the application.                                                                                                                   




                              1Application for patent filed February 22, 1993.                                                                                             

                                                                                    1                                                                                      





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007