Ex parte ROBERT S. DREYER et al. - Page 1




                                         THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                                      
                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                                                                                        
                         (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                                                                                          
                         (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                         Paper No. 19                                      

                                            UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                                      
                                                                      _______________                                                                                      
                                                  BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                                       
                                                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                                                                      
                                                                      _______________                                                                                      
                                                            Ex parte ROBERT S. DREYER                                                                                      
                                                                 and DONALD B. ALPERT                                                                                      
                                                                            _________                                                                                      
                                                                   Appeal No. 96-1620                                                                                      
                                                             Application  07/938,2881                                                                                      
                                                                         _______________                                                                                   
                                                                             ON BRIEF                                                                                      
                                                                         _______________                                                                                   
                         Before HAIRSTON, KRASS, and TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                                
                         KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                               
                                                                    DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                                     
                                   This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 26, all of                                                    
                         the claims pending in the application.                                                                                                            
                                   The invention pertains to the identification of a microprocessor being used in a                                                        
                         particular computer system.                                                                                                                       
                                   Representative independent claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                                                                            
                                   1. In a microprocessor formed on an integrated circuit, an identification apparatus                                                     
                         for identifying the microprocessor in response to a supplied ID instruction, said                                                                 
                         identification apparatus comprising:                                                                                                              

                         1Application for patent filed August 31, 1992.                                                                                                    





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007