THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 30
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ERNST-GUNTHER URBAN
____________
Appeal No. 95-2941
Application No. 08/139,6161
____________
HEARD: January 13, 1998
____________
Before CALVERT, FRANKFORT, and NASE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 8 through 17, which are all of the claims
pending in this application.2
1Application for patent filed October 18, 1993. According
to the appellant, the application is a continuation of
Application No. 07/882,147, filed May 11, 1992, now abandoned.
2Claim 15 has been amended subsequent to the final
rejection by an amendment filed on November 28, 1994 (Paper No.
23).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007