THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 49
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte RICHARD J. BLAYNER and CHARLES L. MATHEWS
____________
Appeal No. 95-4407
Application No. 08/124,8341
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before PATE, NASE, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING
This is in response to the appellants' request for
rehearing of our decision mailed June 18, 1998, wherein we2,3
1Application for patent filed September 21, 1993.
2Filed July 16, 1998.
3Effective Dec. 1, 1997, 37 CFR § 1.197(b) was amended to
change the term "reconsideration" to "rehearing." See the
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007