Ex parte GOODMAN et al. - Page 1




                                                                   Paper No. 10                          
                  THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                           
            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                                   
            (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                                     
            (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                   

                           UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                     
                                           _______________                                               
                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                        
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                              
                                           _______________                                               
                                    Ex parte FRANK C. GOODMAN,                                           
                                        ROBERT T. SEELEY AND                                             
                                          ROBERT J. DEMPSEY                                              
                                           ______________                                                
                                         Appeal No. 96-4102                                              
                                     Application 08/500,4211                                             
                                           _______________                                               
                                           ON BRIEF                                                      
                                           _______________                                               
            Before ABRAMS, PATE, and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.                              
            PATE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                           
                                                                                                        
                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                              
                  This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 4 and 5                           
            and the examiner’s refusal to allow claim 6, amended after final                             
            rejection.  Claims 4, 5, and 6 are the only claims remaining in                              
            the application.                                                                             




                  1Application for patent filed July 10, 1995.                                           
                                                   1                                                     





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007