THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 34
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte FUSEN E. CHEN, FU-TAI LIOU, YIH-SHUNG LIN,
GIRISH A. DIXIT and CHE-CHIA WEI
____________
Appeal No. 97-3530
Application No. 08/418,1221
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before KRASS, MARTIN, and SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed April 6, 1995. According
to appellants, this application is a continuation of
Application 08/146,825 filed November 1, 1993, now abandoned;
which is a continuation of Application 07/835,731 filed
February 11, 1992, now abandoned; which is a continuation of
U.S. Patent No. 5,108,951 issued April 28, 1992, based on
Application 07/609,883 filed November 5, 1990.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007