Ex parte LICHT - Page 1




                                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                        

                    The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written                                                      
                    for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                     
                                                                                                                    Paper No. 29                        
                                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                      
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                       
                                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                                         
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                                         Ex parte LOUIS A. LICHT                                                                        
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                                             Appeal No. 95-0972                                                                         
                                                      Application No. 07/650,4531                                                                       
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                                                      ON BRIEF                                                                          
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                 Before STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge,                                                                                      
                 WILLIAM F. SMITH and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                               
                 NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                     



                                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                         
                          This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                                                                        
                 rejection of claims 1 through 19 and 22 through 29, which are                                                                          
                 all of the claims pending in this application.                                                                                         





                          1Application for patent filed February 4, 1991.                                                                               





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007