Ex parte KITAZUME et al. - Page 1




                                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                        
                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                                                          
                          today (1) was not written for publication in a law                                                                            
                          journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the                                                                               
                          Board.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                Paper No. 33                            
                                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                        
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                         
                                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                                           
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                     Ex parte TOMOYA KITAZUME, TAKASHI YAMAZAKI and KENJI MIZUTANI                                                                      
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                                          Appeal No. 1996-0672                                                                          
                                                    Application No. 08/164,7741                                                                         
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                                     HEARD: September 16, 1999                                                                          
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                 Before METZ, JOHN D. SMITH and LIEBERMAN, Administrative                                                                               
                 Patent Judges.                                                                                                                         
                 JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                            


                                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                           
                          This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the                                                                        
                 final rejection of claims 1, 2, 4, and 5.                                                                                              
                          A copy of appealed claim 1 is reproduced in an attached                                                                       
                 appendix to this decision.                                                                                                             

                          1Application for patent filed December 10, 1993.                                                                              
                 According to the appellants, the application is a                                                                                      
                 continuation-in-part of Application No. 07/949,104, filed                                                                              
                 August 31, 1992, now abandoned.                                                                                                        





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007