Ex parte RICHARDSON - Page 1




                               THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                      

                      The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                                       
                      today (1) was not written for publication in a law                                                         
                      journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the                                                            
                      Board.                                                                                                     

                                                                                               Paper No. 21                      
                                 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                       
                                                       ____________                                                              
                                      BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                         
                                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                                             
                                                       ____________                                                              

                                           Ex parte JAMES O. RICHARDSON                                                          
                                                       ____________                                                              
                                                  Appeal No. 96-2597                                                             
                                            Application No. 08/187,5291                                                          
                                                       ____________                                                              
                                               HEARD: January 15, 1999                                                           
                                                       ____________                                                              

               Before CALVERT, STAAB, and LALL, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                    
               CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                             


                                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                                             
                      This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1,                                                    
               6, 12 and 24.  The other claims remaining in the application,                                                     
               7 to 11 and 13 to 18, have been indicated by the examiner as                                                      


                      1Application for patent filed January 27, 1994.                                                            





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007