Ex parte BELLO et al. - Page 1




                                              THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                                             

                     The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law                                                           
                     journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                                                            

                                                                                                                                 Paper No. 32                                          

                                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                                               
                                                                               _____________                                                                                           

                                                       BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                                              
                                                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                                                              
                                                                               _____________                                                                                           

                                                                    Ex parte STEPHEN E. BELLO,                                                                                         
                                                                            KIEN A. HUA, and                                                                                           
                                                                              JIH-KWON PEIR                                                                                            
                                                                               _____________                                                                                           

                                                                            Appeal No. 96-3236                                                                                         
                                                                         Application 08/295,4931                                                                                       
                                                                              ______________                                                                                           

                                                                                   ON BRIEF                                                                                            
                                                                              _______________                                                                                          

                     Before THOMAS, KRASS and CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                                                

                     KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                                               


                                                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                                             

                                This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 8, 10 through 13, 15                                                         

                     through 21, 23, 24, 26, 27, 29 through 54, 56, 57, 59 and 60, all of the claims remaining in the                                                                  



                                1Application for patent filed August 25, 1994.  According to appellants, this application is a                                                         
                     continuation of Application 07/845,973, filed March 4, 1992.                                                                                                      
                                                                                          1                                                                                            





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007