THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No.
17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte PIERRE DUFRESNE,
NILANJAN BRAHMA, and STEPHEN R. MURFF
____________
Appeal No. 96-3454
Application No. 08/260,2951
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before DOWNEY, OWENS, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's refusal
to allow claims 1-16, which are all of the claims pending in
this application. Upon the filing of this appeal, the
examiner approved entry (advisory mailed September 22, 1995)
1Application for patent filed June 14, 1994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007