Ex parte GALLAGHER et al. - Page 1




                                   THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                          

                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a                      
                law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                               

                                                                                                          Paper No. 23                   


                                   UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                             
                                                             __________                                                                  

                                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                              
                                                      AND INTERFERENCES                                                                  
                                                             __________                                                                  

                                Ex parte DENNIS GALLAGHER, RAMESHWAR BHARGAVA                                                            
                                                      and JACQUELINE RACZ                                                                
                                                             __________                                                                  

                                                         Appeal No. 96-3684                                                              
                                                       Application 08/318,0341                                                           
                                                             ___________                                                                 

                                                              ON BRIEF                                                                   
                                                             ___________                                                                 

                Before WEIFFENBACH, PAK and WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                        

                WEIFFENBACH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                


                                                      DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                 

                        This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection of claims                 

                10-23.  The remaining claims in the case, claims 1-9, have been withdrawn from consideration pursuant                    

                to a restriction requirement.  We reverse.                                                                               

                        Application for patent filed October 4, 1994.  According to appellants, the application is a continuation of1                                                                                                               
                Application 08/051,118 filed April 21, 1993, now abandoned.                                                              
                                                                  -1-                                                                    





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007