Ex parte LU et al. - Page 1




                                  THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                 
                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for                                             
                publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                    
                                                                                                    Paper No. 24                               

                                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                  
                                                             _____________                                                                     
                                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                   
                                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                                      
                                                             _____________                                                                     
                       Ex parte YING-YUH LU, MICHAEL D. CRANDALL and ROBERT D. KOPPES                                                          
                                                             _____________                                                                     
                                                          Appeal No. 96-3933                                                                   
                                                        Application 07/829,8991                                                                
                                                            ______________                                                                     
                                                         HEARD: July 12, 1999                                                                  
                                                           _______________                                                                     

                Before KIMLIN, GARRIS and WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                
                KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                           

                                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                     
                         This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-11.  Claims 12-26, the other                                   
                claims remaining in the present application, stand withdrawn from consideration.  Claim 1                                      
                is illustrative:                                                                                                               




                         1Application for patent filed February 3, 1992.                                                                       
                                                                      1                                                                        





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007