THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 55
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte HIDEO MAKINO
_____________
Appeal No. 97-0783
Application 08/396,1841
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before URYNOWICZ, JERRY SMITH and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judges.
JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s rejection of claims
7, 8 and 10, which constitute all the claims remaining in the application. An amendment after final
1Application for patent filed February 24, 1995. According to appellant, this application is a
continuation of Application 08/171,895, filed December 22, 1993, which is a continuation of
Application 07/946,005, filed September 15, 1992, which is a continuation of Application 07/865,823,
filed April 1, 1992, which is a continuation of Application 07/660,965, filed February 26, 1991, which
is a continuation of Application 07/461,735, filed January 8, 1990.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007