THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte TAKAMICHI YAMAKOSHI, YOSHIHARU SHIMANO, and HIROAKI
YADA
____________
Appeal No. 97-1167
Application No. 08/475,0621
____________
HEARD: August 5, 1999
____________
Before URYNOWICZ, HAIRSTON and BARRY, Administrative Patent
Judges.
BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the final rejection of claims 3, 6, and 11-15. The
1The application, entitled “Digital Magnetic Reproduction
Apparatus and Digital Magnetic Recording/Reproducing
Apparatus” was filed June 7, 1995. The application is a
divisional of Application Serial No. 08/284,238, which was
filed August 2, 1994, and is now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007