Ex parte HARRISON et al. - Page 1




                                              THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                                             

                     The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law                                                           
                     journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                                                            

                                                                                                                                 Paper No. 19                                          

                                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                                               
                                                                               _____________                                                                                           

                                                       BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                                              
                                                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                                                              
                                                                               _____________                                                                                           

                                                                    Ex parte KENT D. HARRISON,                                                                                         
                                                                           SCOTT P. THOME,                                                                                             
                                                                            PETER T. KEITH,                                                                                            
                                                                           DANIEL O. ADAMS,                                                                                            
                                                                        and WILLIAM H. PENNY                                                                                           
                                                                               _____________                                                                                           

                                                                            Appeal No. 97-1313                                                                                         
                                                                         Application 07/931,6951                                                                                       
                                                                              ______________                                                                                           

                                                                                   ON BRIEF                                                                                            
                                                                              _______________                                                                                          

                     Before CALVERT, MARTIN and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                                                     

                     CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                                             


                                                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                                             

                                This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 to 14 and 16 to 25.  Claim 15 has been                                                          


                                1Application for patent filed August 18, 1992.  According to appellants, this application is a                                                         
                     continuation-in-part of Application 07/830,479, filed February 4, 1992, which is a continuation-in-part                                                           
                     of Application 07/398,756, filed August 25, 1989, now abandoned.                                                                                                  
                                                                                          1                                                                                            





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007