Ex parte MANNAVA - Page 1




                                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                        

                    The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written                                                      
                    for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                     
                                                                                                                    Paper No. 17                        
                                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                      
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                       
                                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                                         
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                                  Ex parte SEETHARAMAIAH MANNAVA                                                                        
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                                           Appeal No. 1997-2075                                                                         
                                                      Application No. 08/362,3621                                                                       
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                                                      ON BRIEF                                                                          
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                 Before COHEN, NASE, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                        
                 NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                     



                                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                         
                          This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                                                                        
                 rejection of claims 1 to 5 and 9 to 20.  Claims 6 to 8, the                                                                            
                 remaining claims pending in this application, have been                                                                                
                 objected to as depending from a non-allowed claim.                                                                                     


                          We AFFIRM.                                                                                                                    

                          1Application for patent filed December 22, 1994.                                                                              





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007