Ex parte SERDUKE - Page 1




                                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                        

                    The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written                                                      
                    for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                     
                                                                                                                    Paper No. 10                        
                                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                      
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                       
                                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                                         
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                                      Ex parte GREGORY M. SERDUKE                                                                       
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                                           Appeal No. 1998-1969                                                                         
                                                      Application No. 08/535,7081                                                                       
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                                                      ON BRIEF                                                                          
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                 Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge,                                                                                 
                 FRANKFORT and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                                      

                 NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                     



                                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                         
                          This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                                                                        
                 rejection of claims 13 through 17.  Claims 1, 3 through 7 and                                                                          
                 10 through 12 have been allowed.  Claims 2, 8 and 9 have been                                                                          
                 canceled.  Subsequent to the appeal, claim 17 has been                                                                                 


                          1Application for patent filed September 28, 1995.                                                                             





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007