Ex parte CHRISTENSON - Page 1




                                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                        

                    The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written                                                      
                    for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                     
                                                                                                                    Paper No. 32                        
                                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                      
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                       
                                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                                         
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                                  Ex parte RONALD E. CHRISTENSON                                                                        
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                                           Appeal No. 2000-0006                                                                         
                                                      Application No. 08/868,480                                                                        
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                                                      ON BRIEF                                                                          
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                 Before ABRAMS, NASE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                           
                 NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                     



                                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                         
                          This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                                                                        
                 rejection of claims 3, 5, 6, 12, 15, 26, 31 to 33, 36, 39, 40                                                                          
                 and 46, which are all of the claims pending in this                                                                                    
                 application.1                                                                                                                          




                          1Claims 8 and 9 were canceled subsequent to the final                                                                         
                 rejection.                                                                                                                             





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007