Ex parte MAREK - Page 1




                                 THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                      

               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law             
               journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                              

                                                                                            Paper No. 23                           


                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                        
                                                           __________                                                              

                                       BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                          
                                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                                              
                                                           __________                                                              

                                                Ex parte STEVENSON MAREK                                                           
                                                           __________                                                              

                                                     Appeal No. 1996-1655                                                          
                                                     Application 08/036,157                                                        
                                                          ___________                                                              

                                                           ON BRIEF                                                                
                                                          ___________                                                              


               Before BARRETT, FLEMING and FRAHM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                    

               FRAHM, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                 




                                                    DECISION ON APPEAL                                                             

                       Appellant has appealed to the Board from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 and 3,                  

               which constitute all of the pending claims in the case before us on appeal.  Claims 2, 4 to 8, and 10 to            

               12 have been canceled, and claim 9 stands allowed.                                                                  


                                                                1                                                                  





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007