Ex parte EICHLER et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      

           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
           for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
                                                                 Paper No. 29         
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                     Ex parte JÜRGEN EICHLER, REINHARD KRUMBÖCK,                      
                    WENZEL KÜHN, PETER SCHWARZMAIER, THOMAS WILD,                     
                       RUDOLF SPIELMANNLEITNER, MANFRED STÖGER,                       
                                   and INGOLF MIELKE                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 1996-3367                                 
                              Application No. 08/480,554                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     
          Before JOHN D. SMITH, PAK, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent                 
          Judges.                                                                     
          KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         

                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                 
          rejection of claims 1-10 and 13, which are all of the claims                
          pending in this application.                                                
                                     BACKGROUND                                       










Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007