Ex parte CLEMENCE et al. - Page 1




                             THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                               

                     The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication     
                     in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                    
                                                                                             Paper No. 23               
                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                
                                                    ____________                                                        
                                    BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                  
                                               AND INTERFERENCES                                                        
                                                    ____________                                                        
                             Ex parte FRANCOIS CLEMENCE, ODILE LE MARTRET,                                              
                                 FRANCOISE DELEVALLEE, and MICHEL FORTIN,                                               
                                                    ____________                                                        
                                                Appeal No. 1997-1280                                                    
                                              Application No. 08/356,912                                                
                                                    ____________                                                        
                                               HEARD: March 7, 2000                                                     
                                                    ____________                                                        
              Before JOHN D. SMITH, WARREN, and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judges.                                
              LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                   


                                               DECISION ON APPEAL                                                       

                     This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s refusal to allow claims                
              31 through 33  which are all the claims in the application.1                                              
                                                   THE INVENTION                                                        

                     The invention is directed to enantiomers and diastereoisomers of N-[2,3-dihydro-2-                 
              (1-pyrrolidinyl)-1H-inden-1-yl]-N-methyl-benzene- acetamide derivatives.  The derivatives                 

                     1                                                                                                  






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007