Ex parte BULARCA - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                    
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  
                                                            Paper No. 19              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                              Ex parte VALERIU BULARCA                                
                                   _____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 1997-2836                                  
                               Application 08/106,009                                 
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    

          Before CAROFF, WILLIAM F. SMITH and KRATZ, Administrative                   
          Patent Judges.                                                              
          CAROFF, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This decision on appeal relates to the final rejection of              
          claims 1-6, 10 and 12-25, all the pending claims in                         
          appellant’s application.                                                    
               The appealed claims are directed to a laminated assembly               
          (claims 17-21 and 24-25), and a method for manufacturing the                

                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007