Ex parte HOLLATZ et al. - Page 1






                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                    
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  
                                                            Paper No. 20              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                    _____________                                     
                   Ex parte MICHAEL C. HOLLATZ, DANIEL F. BAKER,                      
                JOSEPH C. STEINLICHT, MARK J. MICHELSON, and KURT E.                  
          SUNDERMAN                                                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 1997-3181                                  
                             Application No. 08/304,345                               
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    

          Before HAIRSTON, FLEMING, and GROSS, Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                     
          FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   


               This is a decision on appeal from the rejection of claims              
          1 through 9 and 11 through 20.  Claim 10 has been canceled.                 

                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007