Ex parte PARISH et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)              
          was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is                 
          not binding precedent of the Board.                                         
                                                            Paper No. 25              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                Ex parte WILLIAM L. PARISH JR., PHILLIP G. MARTIN and                 
                                  PATRICK  D. HYDE                                    
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 1999-0687                                  
                               Application 08/560,315                                 
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    

          Before KIMLIN, JOHN D. SMITH and WALTZ, Administrative Patent               
          Judges.                                                                     
          KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 36,               
          38,  41-55, 57, 58 and 68-72, all the claims remaining in the               
          present application.  Previously appealed claims 37, 56 and                 
          59-67 have been canceled by appellants. Claim 36 is                         
          illustrative:                                                               
               36.   A method of adhering a lens block to a                           
               compound surface of an ophthalmic lens blank,                          





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007