Ex parte SUNDAR - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      

               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not     
               written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.     
                                                               Paper No. 19           
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    ____________                                      

                               Ex parte SATISH SUNDAR                                 
                                    ____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 1999-1759                                  
                             Application No. 08/749,614                               
                                    ____________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                    ____________                                      

          Before CALVERT, COHEN, and FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent                 
          Judges.                                                                     
          CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       


          ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING                                                    
               This is in response to appellant's request for                         
          reconsideration (rehearing) of our decision mailed April 4,                 
          2000, wherein we affirmed the examiner's rejection of claims 1              
          through 4, 6 through 14, 17 through 21, 23 through 31 and 34                
          through 46 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over                 
          Tada in view of Lucas and Lowrance.                                         





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007