Ex parte JOHNSON - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not     
               written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.     
                                                            Paper No. 35              

                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                        
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                         Ex parte THEODORE D. JOHNSON, JR.                            
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 2000-0873                                  
                             Application No. 08/975,983                               
                                   ______________                                     
                              HEARD: February 22, 2001                                
                                   _______________                                    

          Before ABRAMS, STAAB and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges                 
          STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
                                                                                     
               This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final              
          rejection of claims 44-48, 55-76, 79, 82, 85, 88, 91, 94, 97                
          and 100.  Claims 89, 90, 92, 93, 95, 96, 98 and 99 have been                
          allowed.  Dependent claims 77, 78, 80, 81, 83, 84, 86 and 87                
          have been objected to as depending from rejected claims, but                
          otherwise indicated as being allowable if rewritten in                      
          independent form to include the limitations of the base claims              

                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007