Ex parte KOLODZIEJ et al. - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
          publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                      

                                                            Paper No. 14              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                         Ex parte DENNIS RAYMOND KOLODZIEJ,                           
                             MATTHEW JAMES BOEHLEFELD,                                
                                        and                                           
                                   ANDREW SIMONOW                                     
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 2000-1304                                  
                             Application No. 08/994,974                               
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    

          Before CALVERT, FRANKFORT, and McQUADE, Administrative Patent               
          Judges.                                                                     
          McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               Dennis Raymond Kolodziej et al. originally took this                   
          appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 and 3 through 15                
          dated April 6, 1999 (Paper No. 6).  The examiner subsequently               
          reopened prosecution and entered a superseding final rejection              
          of the same claims dated August 4, 1999 (Paper No. 9).  Upon                
          the appellants’ request pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.193(b)(2)(ii),               





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007