Court Opinions

State Laws

US Code

US Constitution

Ex parte LOUZON et al. - Page 1

Legal Research Home > Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 2001 > Ex parte LOUZON et al. - Page 1

               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not     
               written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.     
                                                               Paper No. 27           
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                    ____________                                      
                  Ex parte THOMAS MARK LOUZON, JOSE FELIPE PELAEZ,                    
                               and KEVIN MICHAEL ALLEN                                
                                    ____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 2001-0609                                  
                             Application No. 08/903,484                               
                                    ____________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                    ____________                                      
          Before FRANKFORT, MCQUADE, and NASE, Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                     
          FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                     




                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   


          This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                      
          rejection of claim 16.  Claims 1 through 11, 13 through 15 and              
          18 through 22 stand allowed.  Claim 17, the only other claim                
          remaining in the application, has been objected to and                      
          indicated by the examiner to be allowable if rewritten in                   
          independent form. Claim 12 has been canceled.                               






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007