Ex parte OYAMADA - Page 1




                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                      for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.      

                                                                 Paper No. 31         

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     ____________                                     
                               Ex parte TAKASHI OYAMADA                               
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 2001-1266                                 
                              Application No. 08/966,788                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF1                                      
                                     ____________                                     
          Before CALVERT, STAAB, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.              
          NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                          



                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                 
          rejection of claims 6 to 25, which are all of the claims                    
          pending in this application.                                                


               We REVERSE.                                                            

               1 The oral hearing scheduled for June 13, 2001 was vacated             
          (Paper No. 30, faxed June 4, 2001).  In view of this decision, a            
          hearing is not considered necessary.  See 37 CFR § 1.194(c), last           
          sentence.                                                                   





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007