Ex parte HALVORSON et al. - Page 1




                       The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                                                       
                                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                           

                                                                                                                    Paper No. 23                        

                                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                      
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                       
                                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                                         
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                    Ex parte DAVID H. HALVORSON and JOE B. HUNGATE                                                                      
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                                           Appeal No. 2001-1541                                                                         
                                                      Application No. 09/094,297                                                                        
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                                                      ON BRIEF1                                                                         
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                 Before CALVERT, COHEN, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                         
                 NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                     



                                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                         
                          This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                                                                        
                 rejection of claims 1 to 20, which are all of the claims                                                                               
                 pending in this application.                                                                                                           


                          1The appellants requested an oral hearing (Paper No. 19,                                                                      
                 filed December 26, 2000) and a hearing was scheduled for                                                                               
                 September 13, 2001 (Paper No. 21, mailed July 19, 2001).  The                                                                          
                 appellants confirmed the hearing set for September 13, 2001                                                                            
                 (Paper No. 22, filed July 27, 2001).  However, the appellants                                                                          
                 did not attend the hearing.  Accordingly, the issues raised in                                                                         
                 this appeal will be decided on brief.                                                                                                  





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007