Ex parte DRESCHER - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of                 
          the Board.                                                                  
                                                            Paper No. 22              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                               Ex parte ARMIN DRESCHER                                
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 1997-2990                                  
                               Application 08/260,318                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                              HEARD: September 11, 2001                               
                                     ___________                                      
          Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH and LEVY, Administrative Patent                
          Judges.                                                                     
          JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
          This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134                      
          from the examiner’s rejection of claims 1 and 2, which                      
          constitute all the claims in the application.  A first                      
          amendment after final rejection was filed on July 26, 1995,                 
          and a second amendment after final rejection was filed on                   
          September 1, 1995.  Both amendments were denied entry by the                
          examiner.                                                                   
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007