Ex Parte UEYAMA et al - Page 1




                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for                             
                                      publication and is not binding precedent of the Board                                         
                                                                                                Paper No. 31                      
                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                         
                                                          ____________                                                              
                                        BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                          
                                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                                               
                                                         _____________                                                              
                                  Ex parte YOSHIHARU UEYAMA, MICHIYUKI TAKAGI,                                                      
                       YASUSHI TAKANO, YUKIJI IWASE, MICHIAKI IDA, SADASHI TANAKA,                                                  
                                     YOSHIHIRO NAGAOKA, and TETSUYA YOSHIDA                                                         
                                                         _____________                                                              
                                                      Appeal No. 1999-0033                                                          
                                                   Application No. 08/514,255                                                       
                                                         _____________                                                              
                                                     HEARD: March 3, 2000                                                           
                                                         _____________                                                              
                   Before MCCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judges, STAAB and                                                
                   GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                          
                                                                                                                                   
                   MCCANDLISH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                         

                                                    DECISION ON APPEAL                                                              
                           This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1, 5,                      
                   8, 9, 12 and 21.  Subsequent to the final rejection, appellants canceled claim 21, thus                          
                   leaving for our review the final rejection of claims 1, 5, 8, 9 and 12.  The only other                          
                   claims still pending in the application either have been allowed or have been withdrawn                          
                   from consideration as being directed to a non-elected invention.                                                 










Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007