Ex parte OTT et al. - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of                 
          the Board.                                                                  
                                                  Paper No. 20                        

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                   Ex parte CONRAD L. OTT, ROBERT C. CARLSON, JR.                     
                                 and CHARLES MAYNARD                                  
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 1999-0439                                  
                               Application 08/652,908                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      
          Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH and BARRETT, Administrative                    
          Patent Judges.                                                              
          JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   



                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
          This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134                      
          from the examiner’s rejection of claims 2-8, 11-13 and 33.                  
          Claims 14-32 stand withdrawn from consideration as being                    
          directed to a non-elected invention.  Claim 1 has been                      
          cancelled.  Claims 9 and 10 have been indicated to contain                  

                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007